🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one MEP supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, other states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this global conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.